Introduction In this essay highlighting the second amendment, I will focus mostly on the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment states, “ A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” To be more clear, the ‘Right to Bear Arms’ is the second Amendment of the United States Constitution passed by Congress September 25, Ratified December 15, , the first 10 amendments form the Bill of Right. It is a well regulated Militia; being necessary to the security of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms Essay Words9 Pages The Second Amendment And The Right To Bear Arms Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns
The Right to Bear Arms Free Essay Sample
The framers did not mention police departments or other local governmental units, which has led to some misconceptions about the right of people to arm themselves when protected by municipal government agencies. However, this is because municipal police forces, as they currently exist, the right to bear arms essay, did not exist at the time of the Revolutionary War.
The closest approximation was a standing army or militia, and the concerns about the citizenry failing to arm themselves in that scenario were made clear in the debates and documents the right to bear arms essay up to the ratification of the Constitution. Modern Views on Gun Control However, some time people ratification of the Constitution and modern times, the issue of gun control became one that divided people along ideological lines, rather than one about which people were united.
States in America are frequently referred to as either red or blue, with red states representing Republican strongholds and blue states representing Democrat strongholds: Conservative red America has been described as religiousmoralistic, patriotic, white, masculineand less educated. Liberal blue America has been depicted as secular, relativistic, internationalist, multicultural, feminine, and college educated.
Reds are seen as supporting guns, the death penaltyand the Iraq War, blues as supporting abortion and the environment. Chapter 4, p.
While these are stereotypes that do not define all voters in either political block, the reality is that the issue of gun control has become a hot-button political issue. Why is Gun Control a Major Issue When one looks at the number of violent crimes where guns are involved, the right to bear arms essay seems reasonable to suggest that gun control would be a major issue in the United States, the right to bear arms essay.
It is certainly true that gun crime is higher in the United States than in countries where the citizens do not have access to weapons. It is also certainly true that when a firearm is involved a crime can go from merely the right to bear arms essay to deadly in a matter of moments.
Incidents like the horrible Columbine High School massacre help demonstrate the fact that, once guns are involved in a violent situation, the violence can rapidly escalate. However, the reality is that far more Americans are killed in automobile accidents each year than by gun fire, and yet no one is suggesting that people outlaw automobiles. One reason that gun control might be such a highly-discussed issue is that the media has a slightly left-leaning bias, which is not surprising given that journalists are generally highly-educated, and more highly-educated people tend to lean towards the left.
Therefore, the media portrayal of the number of people who do not support gun control may be inadequate. There may also be a bias towards depicting those who support the right to bear arms as gun nuts or fans of violence.
It is certainly the case that mainstream journalists fail to describe the patriotic history behind the Second Amendment when discussing gun control issues, the right to bear arms essay, leaving members of the public with the impression that the right is antiquated because people are no longer required to hunt for their food and have adequate protection from local law enforcement agencies.
In fact, even the textbook attempts to mislead people about the In Chapter 14, the textbook addresses the right to bear arms, and argues that those in favor of the right to bear arms fail to address the fact that the Second Amendment links that right to a well-ordered militia.
In fact, the textbook explicitly provides that: The language [of the Second Amendment] links the right to bear arms with the security of the state. The language suggests that the right belongs to each state or, if to individuals, only to individuals when they are protecting their state- that is, when they are serving in the militia of their state.
Chapter 14, p. Anyone who understands the Federalist discussions of the right to bear arms knows that position is an absolute misrepresentation of the founder's intent with the Second Amendment. The founding fathers feared a standing army and wanted to assure individual citizens that they would have the right to self-protection, which should not be abridged even if the country develops a standing army.
Moreover, when one views the Bill of Rights as a whole, one sees a document that is concerned with individual rights, not state's rights, so it seems ludicrous to suggest that the Second Amendment would refer to a state's right to maintain a militia.
Both of those facts are made perfectly clear when one reads the Federalist Papers. Moreover, while the textbook acknowledges that a more expansive interpretation may allow individuals the right to use arms to protect themselves, it suggests that people would not be guaranteed the right to bear arms for hunting or any purpose other than self-defense. However, the right to bear arms essay, when one looks at how Britain curtailed individual liberties The Role of the National Rifle Association NRA Because the majority of Americans have come to support gun control, possibly due to ignorance of the historical basis for the right to bear arms, it has become necessary for interest groups to lobby to protect that right, the right to bear arms essay.
The NRA is a single-issue group with the goal of opposing gun control. The NRA helped defeat Al Gore's bid for presidency by mobilizing people in swing-states. Their support for President Bush was repaid; the Bush Administration filed two briefs with the Supreme Court opposing gun control, which reversed approximately 60 years of Executive Department policy on the issue.
Chapter 6, the right to bear arms essay, p. The NRA has successfully lobbied to keep gun-crime victims from being able to sue the manufacturers or dealers of those weapons. In addition, the NRA successfully lobbied to end the ban on owning automatic or assault weapons. Conclusion Violent crime is horrible, and, when guns are involved, is likely to be more severe or deadlier than when other weapons are involved.
However, the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights are not there to promote a safer or tidier America, but to promote liberty, the right to bear arms essay. If one curtailed freedom of the press, it would reduce the amount of civil unrest. If one denied criminal defendants their rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, it would lead to a greater number of convictions and a reduction in criminal activity by those defendants.
However, the concept of American liberty is that life is meaningless without freedom. Yes, gun control efforts might save lives, but the reality is that if American citizens gave up their right to bear arms, most especially those weapons that could match those used by the U. armed forcesthen they would give up their ability to defend themselves if the government became tyrannical.
In the short history of the United States, there have been several times when the government has ignored the Constitution, to the detriment of its citizens. While that has previously been a self-correcting phenomenon, the reality is that, without the threat of being controlled by the citizenry in faster and more meaningful way than the ballot-box, even the American form of government could quickly devolve into tyranny, making it necessary, once again, for patriots to take up arms and defend themselves and their country.
Works Cited Hamilton, Alexander. Hamilton, Alexander. Hardy, David. The American Revolution, the right to bear arms essay. Twin Cities Public Television. Those groups opposed to the private ownership of firearms should base their arguments on their own personal beliefs rather than a Constitutional interpretation defense, the right to bear arms essay.
As supported by its historical background and analysis of Constitutional context and meaning, "A well. In asserting that the right to bear arms must be interpreted in the collectivist point-of-view, the author rationalized that "the more collectively the right is interpreted, the more broadly Congress can legislate to restrict the right to bear arms" In effect, what made sense in Busch's analysis is that this particular right, as stated in the Constitution, must be interpreted in the proper context, the right to bear arms essay.
Thus, Emerson's ownership of. The first argument would be to the right to bear arms essay out that essentially, the right to bear arms is an individual right that can be exercised by any member of the civil society. The second main argument to be pointed out is that gun ownership does not necessarily translate to its improper use, posing as.
The bill did not pass, but eventually a compromise bill went through requiring all handguns to have at least 3. No completely plastic gun has ever been produced, although guns with a plastic frame are popular because they weigh less.
The right to bear arms essay legislation was unnecessary because, again, no problem existed. Apparently, the gun debate is not the place to look for facts. One similarity that communities with high rates of burglaries share is the fact that these communities have "restrictive gun laws," which proves that indeed, gun control acts more as a detriment rather than a support to. Right to Carry Handguns for Self-Protection: The right to carry handguns for the right to bear arms essay abiding citizens has been a continual social and political debate about the restriction or availability of firearms within the country.
Actually, the right to carry handguns has developed to become one of the major controversial and intractable issues within the social and political environments in the nation. The main reason attributed to the development of this controversial issue.
Learning Tools Study Documents Writing Guides About us FAQs Our Blog Citation Generator Flash Card Generator Login SignUp. Download this Thesis in word format. Excerpt from Thesis : The framers did not mention police departments or other local governmental units, which has led to some misconceptions about the right of people to arm themselves when protected by municipal government agencies.
In fact, even the textbook attempts to mislead people about the. Read Full Thesis. Right to Bear Arms - Words: Length: 5 Pages Topic: Law - Constitutional Law Paper : Right to Bear Arms Should Words: Length: 2 Pages Topic: Law - Constitutional Law Paper : Right to Bear Arms Arguing Words: Length: 1 Pages Topic: Law - Constitutional Law Paper : Right to Bear Arms Gun Words: Length: 9 Pages Topic: Law - Constitutional Law Paper : Right to Bear Arms the Words: Length: 2 Pages Topic: Law - Constitutional Law Paper : Right to Carry Handguns for Self-Protection: The Words: Length: 8 Pages Topic: Law - Constitutional Law Paper :
Versus Debates \
, time: 27:15The Right to Bear Arms essay
The Constitution: Suppression of the 2nd Amendment “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not infringed.” This is the 2nd amendment, and it is under attack. Many people believe that guns are To be more clear, the ‘Right to Bear Arms’ is the second Amendment of the United States Constitution passed by Congress September 25, Ratified December 15, , the first 10 amendments form the Bill of Right. It is a well regulated Militia; being necessary to the security of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed The language [of the Second Amendment] links the right to bear arms with the security of the state. The language suggests that the right belongs to each state or, if to individuals, only to individuals when they are protecting their state- that is, when they are serving in the militia of their state. (Chapter 14, p)
No comments:
Post a Comment